History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Goldsmith
194 F. App'x 105
4th Cir.
2006
Check Treatment
Docket

Kathleen R. KIRBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Section 8; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-2292

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted: July 26, 2006. Decided: Aug. 15, 2006.

194 Fed. Appx. 105

Kathleen R. Kirby, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Marie Calleja, Alexander Jones Brackett, Sr., McGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Robert P. McIntosh, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court‘s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority, No. CA-04-791-REP-MHL (E.D.Va. Sep. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Goldsmith
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 15, 2006
Citation: 194 F. App'x 105
Docket Number: 05-7354
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In