History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Gerberti
42 F.2d 570
S.D.N.Y.
1930
Check Treatment
CAFFEY, District Judge.

Neither the petitioner nor the Prohibition Administrator is a party, nor has the latter been served. In these circumstances the court is without jurisdiction to grant the relief sought. See Lewis v. McCarthy (D. C.) 274 F. 496; In re Allen (D. C.) 1 F.(2d) 1020, 1021; Matter of Otto Behrens (2 C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 561.

Apparently, to date, the Prohibition Administrator has failed to take any steps with; respect to the seized property now in his possession. For that reason the court will afford the petitioner opportunity to litigate his claim of rights if and whenever an appropriate remedy is invoked.

Motion denied, without prejudice to any other form of proceeding.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Gerberti
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: May 21, 1930
Citation: 42 F.2d 570
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.