History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Garner
71 M.J. 301
C.A.A.F.
2012
Check Treatment
Docket

CCA 20080401. Review granted on the following issues:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN SHE FAILED TO GIVE ‍​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‍THE NECESSARY INSTRUCTIONS ON SENTENCE RECONSIDERATION.
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE II STATES AN OFFENSE EVEN THOUGH ‍​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‍THE GOVERNMENT DID NOT ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT, EITHER EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Garner
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Date Published: Apr 18, 2012
Citation: 71 M.J. 301
Docket Number: No. 12-0282/AR
Court Abbreviation: C.A.A.F.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In