8 C.M.A. 515 | United States Court of Military Appeals | 1957
Opinion of the Court
The issue in this case is the same as that in United States v Allen, 8 USCMA 504, 25 CMR 8. However, the facts are materially different. The accused was charged with two specifications of larceny. A stipulation, which was received in evidence in conjunction with the accused’s plea of guilty, shows circumstances substantially less aggravat
We conclude from these facts that the accused and his counsel decided advisedly to make no statement and to take a chance on the sentence. We therefore affirm the decision of the board of review.