71-1274 | 3rd Cir. | Apr 12, 1972

458 F.2d 990" date_filed="1972-04-12" court="3rd Cir." case_name="United States v. Francis X. Morin, Jr. Appeal of Albert Lamolinare">458 F.2d 990

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Francis X. MORIN, Jr., et al. Appeal of Albert LaMOLINARE.

No. 71-1274.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Argued March 6, 1972.
Decided April 12, 1972.

John W. Ford, McArdle & Mansmann, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

Richard L. Thornburgh, U. S. Atty., Blair A. Griffith, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

The alleged objectionable statements in the jury instructions asserted for the first time in this court could have been easily remedied by the Trial Judge by simple curative language. Instead of raising these objections voiced in the district court, counsel for appellant expressed himself as "satisfied" with the charge. We can perceive no basis for sustaining the appeal on this issue.

2

United States v. Chicarelli, 445 F.2d 1111" date_filed="1971-07-01" court="3rd Cir." case_name="United States v. Perry Imperatore Chicarelli Appeal of Eugene Napolitano">445 F.2d 1111 (3 Cir. 1971).

3

There is sufficient evidence from which the jury could have inferred that the appellant was an aider and abettor in the Pittsburgh National Bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2. This ground also is ineffectual. United States v. Bradley, 447 F.2d 657" date_filed="1971-08-26" court="3rd Cir." case_name="United States v. Donald Wayne Bradley">447 F.2d 657, 659-660 (3 Cir. 1971).

4

We perceive no reversible error in this record. The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.