History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Foppes
99 F. 558
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1899
Check Treatment
TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). The articles in question were reeds assessed for duty under paragraph 206 of the act of 1897 as “reeds manufactured from rattans,” and claimed by the importers in their protest to b.e free as “reeds unmanufactured,” under paragraph 700 of said act. The action of Judge Lacombe in the case of Foppes v. Magone (C. C.) 48 Fed. 570, in directing a verdict for the importers disposes of the question presented herein. The articles are not cut in lengths, and have only been so stripped of enamel as to transform them from rattan into a reed, leaving the inner portion intact. The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Foppes
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Date Published: Dec 23, 1899
Citation: 99 F. 558
Docket Number: No. 2,958
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.