History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Field
13 Ct. Cust. 552
C.C.P.A.
1926
Check Treatment
BlaND, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The United .States has appealed from the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers (Chas. P. McClelland, G. A., dissenting), which sustained protests of importers to the assessment by the collector of duty on woolen bootees at 50 per centum ad valorem and 45 cents per pound under paragraph 1114 of the act of 1922, and which holds them to be dutiable under paragraph 1405.

*553The merchandise consisted of woolen bootees wholly composed of wool yarn, knitted, and intended to coyer the feet of infants. The bootees had no defined soles.

The merchandise and the issues, as we understand it, are identical with those passed upon by this court in the case of United States v. Kahn & Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 57, T. D. 40881, wherein this court held paragraph 1405 covered “only such boots, shoes, and other footwear as were manufactured with uppers and soles, and that there should be on inspection some visible line of demarcation between such uppers and soles in each instance.”

Under the authority of the above case the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Field
Court Name: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Date Published: Feb 25, 1926
Citation: 13 Ct. Cust. 552
Docket Number: No. 2521
Court Abbreviation: C.C.P.A.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.