History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Ference Lang
157 F.3d 1161
9th Cir.
1998
Check Treatment

ORDER

The opinion in this case, filed on July 21, 1998 [149 F.3d 1044], is amended as follows:

*1162 On page 7818, in the second full paragraph, the first two sentences [149 F.3d at 1046](“Lang subsequently brought ... suppressed Lang’s statements.”) are deleted and the following is inserted in their place:

Lang subsequently brought a pretrial motion to suppress his statements and the narcotics on the ground that they were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights, as they were the product of coercion. The district court conducted an evi-dentiary hearing and held that the agent did coerce the statements and suppressed them.

On page 7820, in the third full paragraph, the second sentence [149 F.3d at 1047](“There is no dispute ... Miranda rights.”) is deleted and the following is inserted in its place:

There is no dispute that Lang, upon being arrested, was coerced into making incriminating statements.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Ference Lang
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 11, 1998
Citation: 157 F.3d 1161
Docket Number: 96-10464
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In