History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Fausto
107 S. Ct. 1344
SCOTUS
1987
Check Treatment

The motion of respondent to amend the question presented is denied. The motion of respondent to file a brief pro se is granted. The motion of respondent to present oral argument pro se is denied. John M. Nannes, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., a member of the Bar of this Court, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Fausto
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 2, 1987
Citation: 107 S. Ct. 1344
Docket Number: No. 86-595
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.