History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Eugene Milford
16-1878
| 4th Cir. | Jan 19, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford’s counterclaims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Milford, No. 2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Eugene Milford
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 19, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1878
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.