midpage

United States v. Edward JamesUnited States v. Edward James

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Feb 13, 2002
99-1762
Versions:280 F.3d 1078
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299
2002 WL 214961

AMENDED OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Upon motion by the defendant, Edward James, for a rehearing, and good cause having been shown, and upon the concession by the government that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty by James that the government could not have adduced any additional proof on the interstate commerce element under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, as to James than it did at trial against the codefendants, Selena Turner and Kevin Larkins, our opinion of November 28, 2001, is amended to reflect that the conviction and sentence of James are REVERSED.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Edward James
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 13, 2002
Citations: 280 F.3d 1078; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299; 2002 WL 214961; 99-1762
Docket Number: 99-1762
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In