Case Information
*1 Before MAYBERRY, JOHNSON, and SPERANZA, Appellate Military Judges.
________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
We have this case for further review because the original convening au- thority’s action failed to reflect the deferral of Appellant’s reduction to E-1, which was a term of Appellant’s pretrial agreement. United States v. Duran , No. ACM S32407, 2017 CCA LEXIS 381, at *1–2 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 31 May 2017).
United States v. Duran , No. ACM S32407 (f rev) Having resolved that issue, we find the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Mili- tary Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED .
FOR THE COURT KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court
2