History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Drury
396 F.3d 1143
| 11th Cir. | 2004
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

358 F.3d 1280

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carl M. DRURY, Jr., M.D., Doctor, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-12924.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 3, 2004.

William E. Bubsey, McCord, Bubsey, Ketchum & Donohue, LLP, Tallahassee, FL, Thomas A. Withers, Gillen, Dailey, Cromwell & Withers, LLC, Savannah, GA, Edward T.M. Garland, Donald Samuel, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Amy Lee Copeland, Savannah, GA, Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (No. 01-00028-CR-01-2); Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., Judge.

(Opinion Sept. 2, 2003, 344 F.3d 1089, 11th Cir.2003) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Drury
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Feb 3, 2004
Citation: 396 F.3d 1143
Docket Number: 02-12924
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.