History
  • No items yet
midpage
29 F.4th 816
6th Cir.
2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID E. MCCALL, JR.

No. 21-3400

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

April 1, 2022

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b); File Name: 22a0059p.06; United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland, No. 1:13-cr-00345-41—Christopher A. Boyko, District Judge.

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Rebecca Chattin Lutzko, Matthew B. Kall, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY‘S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON RESPONSE: Vanessa Malone, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Akron, Ohio, for Appellant.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. David McCall, Jr.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 1, 2022
Citations: 29 F.4th 816; 21-3400
Docket Number: 21-3400
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    United States v. David McCall, Jr., 29 F.4th 816