History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. David McCall, Jr.
29 F.4th 816
| 6th Cir. | 2022
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN,

NALBANDIAN, READLER, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Rebecca Chattin Lutzko, Matthew B. Kall, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON RESPONSE: Vanessa Malone, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Akron, Ohio, for Appellant.

_________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

No. 21-3400 United States v. McCall Page 2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT ___________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. David McCall, Jr.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 1, 2022
Citation: 29 F.4th 816
Docket Number: 21-3400
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.