*1 Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Flores Reydondo directly appeals after he pled guilty to an immigration offense and the district court sentenced him to a prison term at the high end of the [1]
*2 calculated guidelines range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions; if sentence is within guidelines range, appellate court may, but is not required to, apply presumption of reasonableness). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-
[1] The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.