History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Dabbs
134 F.3d 1071
11th Cir.
1998
Check Treatment

*1 BARKETT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I concur in the majority opinion except as to the majority’s affirmance of the restitution order imposed against appellant Floyd. I do not believe that the record reflects that the district court considered Floyd’s ability to pay $593,456.82 in restitution, especially where the PSI found that Floyd did not have the ability to pay a fine within the guideline range of $6,000 to $60,000. Accordingly, I would remand the case to the district court for consideration of Floyd’s ability to pay.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Dabbs
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Feb 6, 1998
Citation: 134 F.3d 1071
Docket Number: 95-2914
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.