History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Cottingham
2 Blatchf. 470
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1852
Check Treatment
THE COURT

decided that the prisoner had no right to any of the peremptory challenges claimed, because such challenges were not allowed at common law in any other than capital cases. See note to U. S. v. Reed [Case No. 16,134.]

It also charged the jury that the purpose for- which the letter from which the money was taken was mailed, was not a question un-' der the act.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Cottingham
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
Date Published: Oct 20, 1852
Citation: 2 Blatchf. 470
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.