History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Conner
1 Cranch 102
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1802
Check Treatment
THE COU.RT

instructed the jury that it was not necessary for the United States to prove that the traverser was the owner of the table, if he played at it as owner, and' appeared to be the person who set it up. And that it was of no importance whether the traverser acted as principal or as agent or servant for the owner of the table. In each case he was equally guilty.

Quaere. See U. S. v. Voss [Case No. 16,828], and the cases there referred to.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Conner
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1802
Citation: 1 Cranch 102
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.