History
  • No items yet
midpage
706 F. App'x 123
4th Cir.
2017

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Coley Terrance HOLMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7077

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: December 13, 2017

Submitted: November 27, 2017

Coley Terrance Holman, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Coley Terrance Holman seeks to appeal the district court‘s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court‘s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Coley Holman
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 13, 2017
Citations: 706 F. App'x 123; 17-7077
Docket Number: 17-7077
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In