*1 Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Jose Luis Guadalupe Castro-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 7-month custodial sentence. *2 Castro- Lopez’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Castro- Lopez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
AFFIRMED.
2 24-6754
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).