History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Carper
75 F.2d 191
4th Cir.
1935
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a war risk insurance case. The premium paid on the policy continued the insurance in force to December 31, 1918; and the only question which we need consider is whether there was substantial evidence that at that time the insured was totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of the policy. We think that this question must be answered in the negative. The suit was not filed until June, 1932, and the insured was then suffering from grand mal epilepsy, and there was evidence to warrant the conclusion that he was suffering from the same disease at the time of the lapse of the policy. There is no evidence, however, that at that time the disease had reached such stage as to constitute total and permanent disability. On the contrary, there was uncontradicted evidence that insured did work extending over a period oi several years, and earned wages m , . .. , , TT , a very substantial amount. Under such circumstances, verdict should have been directed for the government. Lumbra v. U. S., 290 U. S. 551, 54 S. Ct. 272, 78 L. Ed. 492; U. S. v. Legg (C. C. A. 4th) 70 F.(2d) 106. judgment appealed from will be reversed,

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Carper
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 16, 1935
Citation: 75 F.2d 191
Docket Number: No. 3744
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.