History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Carlos Rodriguez-Padron
690 F. App'x 451
| 8th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

*2 A jury found Carlos Alejandro Rodriguez-Padron guilty of two counts of distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). The district court sentenced him to 97 months in prison, followed by four years of [1]

supervised release. On appeal, Rodriguez-Padron’s counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the admission of certain evidence, and the reasonableness of the sentence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The trial evidence showed that Rodriguez-Padron twice sold an ounce of methamphetamine to a confidential informant, and the transactions were captured on audio and video recordings. See United States v. Garcia , 646 F.3d 1061, 1066-67 (8th Cir. 2011). After Rodriguez-Padron testified that the transactions were not what they appeared to be and that he was unfamiliar with methamphetamine, the district court properly allowed the government to introduce impeachment evidence—with a limiting instruction—in the form of Rodriguez-Padron’s proffer statements, and another witness’s testimony about Rodriguez-Padron’s prior methamphetamine transactions. See United States v. Clarke , 564 F.3d 949, 957-58 (8th Cir. 2009) (finding no error under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) by allowing impeachment evidence); United States v. Rowley , 975 F.2d 1357, 1362 (8th Cir. 1992) (upholding admission of defendant’s proffer statements for impeachment purposes). There is no support in the record for a finding that the sentence, which was at the bottom of the guidelines range, was unreasonable. See United States v. Harlan , 815 F.3d 1100, 1107 (8th Cir. 2016).

Having conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issue.

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

[1] The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Carlos Rodriguez-Padron
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 6, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 451
Docket Number: 16-3706
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.