11 F.2d 809 | 3rd Cir. | 1926
The same questions of law and fact are involved in the' above two cases. They were tried together and disposed of in one opinion in the District Court. The
The charterer ordered the steamers from New York to Philadelphia on June 19, 1920, which was Saturday. They left New York the next day, Sunday. On June 18, 1920, a strike of the trainmen at Port Richmond, one of the two coal piers in Philadelphia where the boats could be loaded, broke out. A day or two thereafter it spread to the Greenwich Point pier, the other port in that city where coal could be loaded. There is a question as to whether or not the charterer knew of the strike when the steamers were ordered to Philadelphia.
Lay days for loading, if required by Jacks & Co., were not to commence before June 5, 1920; if not required, they were to commence from the time the steamer was ready to load (or within 48 hours after readiness to load, if there was a delay while awaiting turn at berth), and after notice had been given in writing by the master of such readiness to the Shipping Board. The cargo was to be loaded with customary dispatch, but in no case was less than 1,500 tons per running day to be loaded. Any time lost through riots, strikes, etc., was not to be computed as part of the loading time. Because of the strike they were unable to begin loading until July 23, when the Henry County was assigned to berth. She completed her loading July 27, and the Franklin County the following day.
Libels were filed by the United States, as owner of these steamers, to recover for demurrage while they were waiting to load. The government contends that the strike does not excuse the delay because after it started, the steamers should have been ordered to one of the other ports, and not to Philadelphia. It contends that in any event the boats could have been loaded at Greenwich pier.
The appellant, in our opinion, cannot prevail, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the late learned trial judge, which we adopt as expressing our views.
The decrees are affirmed.