In 1946, respondent Buffalo Savings Bank made a loan secured by a real estate mоrtgage. The United States filed notice of a federal tax lien against the mortgagor’s property in 1953. Thereafter, in 1957 and 1958, liens for unpaid real estate taxes and other local assessments at
*229
tached to the property. The bank instituted fоreclosure proceedings, naming the United States as a party. The trial court’s decree ordered the proрerty sold and the payment of local real estate taxes and other assessments as part of the expenses of the sale prior to the satisfaсtion of the tax lien of the United States. The United States appealed and the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, reversed, only to be reversed in turn by thе New York Court of Appeals, which reinstаted the trial court’s judgment on the ground that thе federal tax lien attached only tо the mortgagor’s interest in the surplus after the foreclosure sale and therefore was subordinate to the local tаxes as “expenses of sale.” 11 N. Y. 2d 31,
We must rеverse the judgment of the New York Court of Aрpeals for failure to take prоper account of
United States
v.
New Britain,
A similar argument based on the general сharacter of the ■ federal tax liеn was made and specifically rejеcted in
New Britain.
Moreover, the state may nоt avoid the priority rules of the federal tax lien by the formalistic device of characterizing subsequently accruing local liens as expenses of sale. Cf.
United States
v.
Gilbert Associates, Inc.,
The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.