History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Bryan N. Was and Norman Was
869 F.2d 34
2d Cir.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

Defendants Bryan N. Was and Norman Was appeal from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Peter C. Dorsey, Judge, following their conditional pleas of guilty to firearms offenses. Bryan Was pleaded guilty to one count of transferring a firearm that was a machine-gun within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b) (1982), in violation of id. §§ 5861(e) and 5871 (1982 & Supp. II 1984); both defendants pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to transfer such firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982). On appeal, defendants contend principally that the district court should have dismissed the indictment on the ground that the items they transferred, known as “auto sears,” as a matter of law cannot be deemed machineguns within the meaning of § 5845(b) because an auto sear is not a “combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun,” 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b).

We reject defendants’ arguments and affirm the judgments of conviction substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, reported at 684 F.Supp. 350 (1988).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Bryan N. Was and Norman Was
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Feb 13, 1989
Citation: 869 F.2d 34
Docket Number: 769, 890, Dockets 88-1402, 88-1403
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In