History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Bidgood
37 F. App'x 665
4th Cir.
2002
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Dean Bidgood, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Dean Bidgood appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Bidgood, No. CR-95-32 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Bidgood
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 19, 2002
Citation: 37 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: 02-6531
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.