History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Angelet
26 F.R.D. 408
S.D.N.Y.
1960
Check Treatment
METZNER, District Judge.

The motion pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., to examine statements taken from the defendants, is denied. It appears that the defendants did not furnish signed statements. United States v. Singer, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1956, 19 F.R.D. 90.

The motion seeking a bill of particulars, pursuant to Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, is disposed of as follows:

As to the first 6 counts of the indictment, Items 1 and 2 are granted to the extent consented to by the Government. Item 3 is granted. Item 4 is denied. Item 5 is granted on consent. Item 6 is denied. Item 7 is granted. This disposition is in conformity with the great weight of authority in this district in this type of case. See also United States v. Smith, D.C.W.D.Mo.1954, 16 F.R.D. 372, and Roviaro v. United States, 1957, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639.

As to the 7th count, Items 1 and 2 are granted to the extent consented to by the Government. Item 3 is denied.

As to the 8th count, Items 4, 5, 6, 10, 11 and 12 are granted. Items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15 and 16 are denied.

The motion seeking an analysis of the alleged narcotic drugs is denied.

So ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Angelet
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: May 4, 1960
Citation: 26 F.R.D. 408
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.