History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Amparo-Concepcion
347 F.3d 985
1st Cir.
2003
Check Treatment
Docket

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. MAXIMILIANO AMPARO-CONCEPCIÓN, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 02-1935, 02-1936

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

October 28, 2003

Before Lynch, Circuit Judge, Siler, Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Daniel R. Dominguez, U.S. District Judge]

Maximiliano Amparo-Concepción on brief pro se.

Thomas F. Klumper, Assistant United States Attorney, H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, and Sonia I. Torres, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

October 28, 2003

* Of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Per Curiam. For the reasons stated in

United States v. Rosa-Ortiz, No. 02-2362, appellant‘s guilty plea in No. 02-1935 is vacated and the case is remanded for dismissal of the indictment.

Appellant‘s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 stands. Because we vacate his conviction on the conspiracy charge, however, appellant‘s total offense level must be recalculated and a new sentence imposed. Accordingly, appellant‘s sentence in No. 02-1936 is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for resentencing.

So ordered.

Dissenting opinion follows.

SILER, Circuit Judge (dissenting). For the reasons stated in my opinion in the companion case to this appeal,

United States v. Rosa-Ortiz, No. 02-2362, I respectfully dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Amparo-Concepcion
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Oct 28, 2003
Citation: 347 F.3d 985
Docket Number: 02-1935
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.