History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Alfredo Iriarte-Ortega
127 F.3d 1200
9th Cir.
1997
Check Treatment

The opinion filed May 9, 1997 [113 F.3d 1022], is amended as follows:

Slip op. pg. 5492, lines 11-12 [113 F.3d at 1024]:

Change “fifteen years” to “146 months”.

*1201 Slip op. pg. 5492, footnote 1, line 1 [113 F.3d at 1024]:

Add ‘Triarte challenges only the first element, i.e., that he entered an agreement to accomplish an illegal objective. See Brief for Appellant at 26 (“The failure of proof in this case lies entirely in the failure to prove that any agreement was ever made and that Mr. Triarte knowingly and intentionally joined some agreement.”) (emphasis omitted).”.
Start the next sentence in footnote 1 (“Both the government and Iriarte ...”) as a new paragraph.

The petition for rehearing is otherwise denied. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en bane and no active judge has requested a vote thereon. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is therefore rejected. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Alfredo Iriarte-Ortega
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 5, 1997
Citation: 127 F.3d 1200
Docket Number: 96-50151
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.