History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov
458 F.2d 1360
5th Cir.
1972
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. The statements of Armenteros inculpating Ninov made during the commission of the crime were properly admitted into evidence, given the independent evidence of concert of action between the two. Migliore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 786; United States v. Williams, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 642; United States v. Bey, 3 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 188. In addition, there is no merit in the assignments of error based on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

Notes

1

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 1, 1972
Citation: 458 F.2d 1360
Docket Number: 72-1062
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.