UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alejandro LOPEZ-PLACENCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-1296.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Nov. 2, 2012.
Submitted: July 13, 2012.
775
PER CURIAM.
Alejandro Lopez-Placencia pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute. See
We conclude that the district court committed no significant procedural error in sentencing Lopez-Placencia, and that the sentence was substantively reasonable. See United States v. Farmer, 647 F.3d 1175, 1178 (8th Cir.2011) (describing appellate review); United States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir.2003) (only authority to depart from statutory minimum sentence is in
Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel‘s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.
