History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Aldo Tarallo
413 F.3d 928
9th Cir.
2005
Check Treatment
Docket

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION

The opinion filed August 20, 2004, is amended as follows:

On slip opinion page 11814, and published at 380 F.3d 1174, 1196 (9th Cir.2004), delete footnote 9 and add the following sentence to the conclusion at the end of the opinion: “The remainder of the sentence is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Graber has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges D.W. Nelson and Gibson have so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Aldo Tarallo
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 29, 2005
Citation: 413 F.3d 928
Docket Number: 02-50252
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In