History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Albert Nelson
693 F. App'x 210
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Shaw Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion to reconsider the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nelson , No. 5:95-cr-00333-CMC-5 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Albert Nelson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 20, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 210
Docket Number: 17-6347
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.