History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Albert A. Seretti
754 F.2d 817
9th Cir.
1985
Check Treatment

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for appointment of counsel to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari does not comply with section 3(e) of the Ninth Circuit Revised Provisions for the Representation on Appeal of Persons Financially Unable to Obtain Representation, which requires a petition to “state the grounds for seeking a writ of certiorari and the reasons why the ends of justice require the appointment of counsel.” In spite of this defect, we have reviewed appellant’s case to determine whether there are any issues that might be presented to the Supreme Court for review. We conclude that a petition for certiorari would be frivolous. Appointment of counsel in a case such as this is discretionary, and is to be made “as the interests of justice may dictate.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(c) (1982). Since petitioner has no substantial grounds on which to petition for certiorari, appellant’s petition for appointment of counsel is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Albert A. Seretti
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 25, 1985
Citation: 754 F.2d 817
Docket Number: 83-1194
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.