History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. AGURS
2:12-cr-00100
W.D. Pa.
Nov 20, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) ) Criminal Action No. 12-100 v. ) ) Judge Cathy Bissoon DAMON AGURS, )

Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Damon Agurs’s Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed on October 3, 2016. (Doc. 131). The Government timely responded in opposition to this Motion (Doc. 135) and Defendant timely replied in support (Doc. Doc. 136).

Defendant’s Motion rests entirely on the argument that the residual clause of the career offender guideline, United States Sentencing Guideline § 4B1.2, is unconstitutionally vague for the same reasons that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) was found invalid in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). See, e.g., Motion to Vacate Sentence at ¶¶ 20, 31, 43, 45.

Subsequent to the filing of Defendant’s Motion and the Government’s Response, the Supreme Court decided Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886 (2017), in which it held that “[b]ecause the advisory Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to a due process vagueness challenge, § 4B1.2(a)’s residual clause is not void for vagueness.” Id. at 897.

As a result, Defendant’s arguments are foreclosed by Beckles and his Motion to Vacate Sentence is DENIED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 20, 2017 s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon United States District Judge cc (via email notification):

All counsel of record

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. AGURS
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 20, 2017
Docket Number: 2:12-cr-00100
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.