History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Addatte
6 Blatchf. 76
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1868
Check Treatment
BENEDICT, District Judge.

I am of the opinion that the ruling at the trial was wrong, and that the witness was improperly excluded. On examining the question, I find the rule to be, that, when trials are separate, the wife may testify in favor of or against any one other than her husband, except in cases where the acquittal of one defendant works the acquittal of the rest, as in cases of conspiracy, and the like. It is not contended, in this case, that the acquittal of the prisoner would work the acquittal of the other defendant, and the wife of the latter was, therefore, a competent witness. The motion for a new trial is granted.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Addatte
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
Date Published: Mar 14, 1868
Citation: 6 Blatchf. 76
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.