midpage

United States v. AdamsUnited States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
May 12, 1976
Nos. 73-1173 to 73-1177 and 73-1191
Versions:

OPINION

Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:

The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case,

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Adams
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: May 12, 1976
Citations: 536 F.2d 303; Nos. 73-1173 to 73-1177 and 73-1191
Docket Number: Nos. 73-1173 to 73-1177 and 73-1191
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In