History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford
343 F.3d 961
9th Cir.
2003
Check Treatment
Docket

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Case Details

Case Name: United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 2, 2003
Citation: 343 F.3d 961
Docket Number: 01-50633
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.