26415 | 9th Cir. | Sep 13, 1971
447 F.2d 1376" date_filed="1971-09-13" court="9th Cir." case_name="United States of America, and v. Joseph Anthony Davis">447 F.2d 1376
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Joseph Anthony DAVIS, Appellant.
No. 26415.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 12, 1971, Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1971.
Daniel Kannlen (argued), Somers & Kallen, Santa Monica, Cal., for appellant.
Elgin Edwards, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.
Davis contends that the implication of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295" date_filed="1970-01-19" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Gutknecht v. United States">396 U.S. 295, 90 S. Ct. 506, 24 L. Ed. 2d 532, and other cases require a finding here that induction was accelerated because of his delinquency. On the record, we think not.
United States v. Davis (9th Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 1009" date_filed="1970-11-06" court="4th Cir." case_name="Edward Kelly v. Eclipse Motor Line, an Ohio Corporation, and Wilson Freight Company (Formerly Wilson Freight Forwarding Company), an Ohio Corporation">432 F.2d 1009; Misenhimer v. United States (9th Cir. July 22, 1971) 71-1384; and United States v. Pennington (9th Cir. 1971), 439 F.2d 145" date_filed="1971-05-11" court="9th Cir." case_name="United States v. Jon Mardis Pennington">439 F.2d 145, require affirmance. We find United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417" date_filed="1971-06-28" court="4th Cir." case_name="United States v. Larry Nolan Dobie">444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir., 1971) distinguishable.
The mandate will issue now.