71-1134_1 | 9th Cir. | Jul 7, 1971
446 F.2d 224" date_filed="1971-07-07" court="9th Cir." case_name="United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon">446 F.2d 224
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Edward Elmer DIXON, Appellant.
No. 71-1134.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 7, 1971.
PER CURIAM:
The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.
As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165" date_filed="1971-06-15" court="9th Cir." case_name="United States v. Mark Albert Roy">441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.
Louis L. Deckter (argued), Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.
Stanley L. Patchell (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.