History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work
263 U.S. 690
SCOTUS
1924
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed upon the authority of *691Riverside Oil Co. v. Hitchcock, 190 U. S. 316; Ness v. Fisher, 223 U. S. 683; Alaska Smokeless Coal Co. v. Lane, 250 U. S. 549; Hall v. Payne, 254 U. S. 343; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U. S. 473, 479.

Mr. Samuel Herrick, with whom Mr. P. W. Spaulding was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. L. Underwood', Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 21, 1924
Citation: 263 U.S. 690
Docket Number: No. 173
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.