United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350, 366.

No. 366. No. 368. No. 369. No. 370. No. 371. No. 372.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Danes for the defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Apr 10, 1916

Citation: 241 U.S. 647

Docket Number: Nos. 365 and 367; No. 366; No. 368; No. 369; No. 370; No. 371; No. 372

Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS