Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want'of. jurisdiction on the authority of Hm-*707derson Bridge Company v. Henderson City, 141 U.S. 679" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1891-12-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/henderson-bridge-co-v-henderson-city-93190?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="93190">141 U. S. 679; Lehigh Water Company v. Easton, 121 U.S. 388" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1887-04-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/lehigh-water-co-v-easton-91930?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="91930">121 U. S. 388; Sioux City Street Railway Company v. Sioux City, 138 U.S. 98" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1891-01-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/sioux-city-street-railway-co-v-sioux-city-92936?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="92936">138 U. S. 98 ; New Orleans City and Lake Railroad Company v. Louisiana, 157 U.S. 219" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1895-03-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/new-orleans-city--lake-railroad-v-louisiana-ex-rel-city-of-new-orleans-94155?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="94155">157 U. S. 219.
Mr. George W. Weadock in' support of motions.