Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Burns (In Re Gaylord Grain L.L.C.)Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Burns (In Re Gaylord Grain L.L.C.)
Uniоn Planters Bank, N.A. appeals from an order of the bankruptcy court 1 granting the trustee’s motion to sell two vehicles free and clear of the bank’s security interest. Because we conclude that the bankruptcy court correctly granted the motion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
On August 12, 1999, the bank executed a Commercial Security Agreement with the debtor, Gaylord Grain, LLP, in the amount of $250,000, listing as collateral all equipment, farm products, livestock and farm equipment. On August 16, 1999, the bank filed a UCC Form No. 1 with the Bloomfield, Missоuri Recorder of Deeds and listed all equipment, farm products, livestock and farm equipment as covered property. On August 20, 1999, the bank filed a UCC Form No. 1 with the Missouri Secretary of State and listed in part all equipment, farm products, livestock and farm equipment as covered property.
On August 21, 2002, the debtor filed for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. On May 7, 2003, the trustee filed his motion seeking authority to sell personal property free and clear of liens. The bank objected, asserting a lien in the two items which the trustee sought to sell: a 1984 Mack Tractor and a 1986 Timpte Trailer. The bank believes it is entitled to the proceeds from the sale of these two items. On June 24, 2003, the bankruptcy court granted the trustee’s motion. Thе bank appeals.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
We review the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact, whether based upon oral or documentary evidence, for clear error, and its legal conclusions are reviewed
de novo.
TIMELINESS
The trustee has raised the issue of the timeliness of the appellant’s notice of appeal. The trustee concedes that the notice of appeal was timely filed, but argues that the notice of appeal was not accompanied by the requisite filing fee which was not paid until later, thereby rendering the notice of appeal untimely. However, the record supports a determination that the fee was paid with the notice and we also note that the clerk of bankruptcy court’s dоcket, at entry number 51, specifically indicates a notice of appeal filed on July 7, 2003, with a notation that the filing fee has been paid. We conclude that the notice of appeal was timely.
MOOTNESS
The trustee filed a motion to dismiss this аppeal, arguing that the sale of the tractor and the trailer renders the appeal moot. We disagree. In
Forbes v. Forbes (In re Forbes),
BONA FIDE DISPUTE
The trustee may sell property under subsection (b) or (c) of this section free and clear of any interest in such property of an entity other than the estate, only if ... (4) such interest is in bona fide dispute.
In this case, the trustee did not file an adversary proceeding seeking to avoid the creditor’s liens before he sought to sell the property free and clear of interests. Thus, the issue becomes whether there is a “bona fide disputе” for purposes of
The term “bona fide dispute” is not defined in
Moreover, courts have recognized that to qualify as a “bona fide dispute” under
Thus, although the trustee did not file an adversary proceeding seeking to avoid the liens in question, he may nevertheless sell free and clear of the bank’s liens if he can show, pursuant to
PERFECTION OF THE LIENS
Not only has the trustee established an objective basis for avoidance, we agree with the bankruptcy court that the trustee сan avoid the liens because the bank failed to perfect its liens on the two motor vehicles. The liens on the motor vehicles should have been perfected in accordance with the provisions of former Mo. Stat. Chaptеr 301. Pursuant to this statute, a lien on a motor vehicle is perfected, with certain exceptions, when an application for a certificate of ownership is delivered to the director of revenue. Mo. Stat. § 301.600(2) provides:
A lien or еncumbrance on a motor vehicle or trailer is perfected by the delivery to the director of revenue of the existing certificate of ownership, if any, an application for a certificate of ownership contаining the name and address of the lienholder and the date of his security agreement, and the required certificate of ownership fee. It is perfected as of the time of its creation if the delivery of the aforesaid to the director of revenue is completed within thirty days thereafter, otherwise as of the time of delivery.
Mo. Stat. § 301.600(2);
In re Westfall,
The method provided in sections 301.600 to 301.660 of perfecting and giving notice of liens and encumbrances subject to sections 301.600 to 301.660 is exclusive.
Mo. Stat. § 301.650(2) (emphasis added.)
The bank’s argument that, because the motor vehicles were also equipment, it had the alternative of perfecting under UCC provisions is unavailing in the face of the statute’s use of the word “exclusive.” The bank did not follow the procedure set forth in Mo. Stat. § 301.600(2). Instead, it filed financing statements. However, the filing provisions оf the Missouri Uniform Commercial Code have no application to motor vehicles and perfection of liens therein. Mo. Stat. § 301.650(2);
In re Jackson,
APPLICATION OF
The bankruptcy trustee has, as of the commencement of the case, the rights and powers of a hypothetical judicial lien creditor.
(a) The trustee shall have, as of the commencement of the case, and without regard to any knowledge of the trustee or of any creditor, the rights and powersof, or may avoid any transfer of рroperty of the debtor or any obligation incurred by the debtor that is voidable by—
(1) a creditor that extends credit to the debtor at the time of the commencement of the case, and that obtains, at such time and with respect to such сredit, a judicial lien on all property on which a creditor on a simple contract could have obtained such a judicial lien, whether or not such a creditor exists.
11 U.S.C
Because the bank did not perfect its liens on the 1984 Mack Tractor and the 1986 Timpte Trailer, the trustee’s hypothetical lien becomes superior to the un-perfected liens of Union Planters Bank. Consequently, the trustee may avoid the bank’s liens.
ADEQUATE PROTECTION UNDER
Ordinarily, when the trustee proposes to sell property free and clear of an interest in property, the bankruptcy court grants a replacement lien in the proceeds of the sale as a condition of the sale. That is because
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, at any time, on request of an entity that has an interest in property used, sold, or leased, or proposed to be used, sold, or leased, by the trustee, the сourt, with or without hearing, shall prohibit or condition such use, sale, or lease as is necessary to provide adequate protection of such interest...
In this case, the record does not indicate that the bank made a request for adequate protection pursuant to
SANCTIONS
The trustee has made a motion for sanctions pursuant to Rule 8020, which provides:
If a district court or bankruptcy appellate panel determines that an appeal from аn order, judgment, or decree of a bankruptcy judge is frivolous, it may, after a separately filed motion or notice from the district court or bankruptcy appellate panel and reasonable opportunity to respond, аward just damages and single or double costs to the appellee.
After a careful review of the record and consideration of all of the appellant’s arguments, we conclude that this appeal is frivolous and sanctiоns are warranted. We think the result of the appeal is obvi
As a result of this frivolous appeal, the trustee has incurred attorney’s fees and expenses for defending this appeal, which include preparing and filing a brief and traveling from Cape Girardeau to St. Louis for oral argument. These are all expenses which will be treated as administrative expenses in the case and thus reduce the distribution to creditors. We thus assess damages аgainst the bank and in favor of the trustee in the amount of $2,500.00.
CONCLUSION
Because the bank did not comply with Mo. Stat. § 301.600(2), its lien was unper-fected. Because the lien was unperfected, the trustee could avoid it under § 544(a)(1). Because the lien was avoidablе, it was the subject of a bona fide dispute. Because the lien was the subject of a bona fide dispute, the trustee was entitled to sell the property free of the lien. We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court’s order granting the trustee’s motion and award the appellee $2,500.00 in damages.
Notes
. The Honorable Barry S. Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
. In fact, that is exactly what happened. The appellants succeeded in having the bankruptcy court's order reversed and the sale proceeds were paid to them.