History
  • No items yet
midpage
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
116 U.S. 402
SCOTUS
1886
Check Treatment

6 S.Ct. 631

116 U.S. 402

29 L.Ed. 677

UNION PACIFIC RY. CO.
v.
UNITED STATES.

Filed January 18, 1886.

This case was commenced in the court of claims by three petitions, on one of which judgment was rendered against the railroad, and on appeal reversed. See 104 U. S. 662. After the cases were remanded they were consolidated and an amended petition filed. A letter, which was not made an exhibit to the amended petition, was attached to the original petition as an exhibit and referred to in the finding of fact by the court of claims by reference to the petition, but was not found as a fact in the decision of the case on the amended petition. The railroad company moved for a writ of certiorari to the court of claims requiring it to transmit the record and the finding of fact in the original suit and said letter.

John F. Dillon, J. M. Wilson, and S. Bartlett, for motion.

Sol. Gen. Goode, in opposition.

WAITE, C. J.

1

This motion is denied. The findings of fact on the first trial in the court of claims have not under our rules any place in this record. Those findings were set aside when the judgment thereon was reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial. On this appeal we consider only the findings at the second trial. The original petition filed in the court of claims contained by reference the letter of September 1, 1876. In the amended petition, on which the last trial was had, this letter was omitted. It is not, therefore, any part of the record on this appeal. We decided on the former motion to send the case back for further findings, that it could not now be brought here as part of the evidence, and that it was not the proper subject of a special finding. We see no reason to reconsider that decision.

Case Details

Case Name: Union Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 18, 1886
Citation: 116 U.S. 402
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.