We do not think it is at all necessary to follow the intricacies of the law of vendor and purchaser in this case, for it appears to us quite clear that the defendant in error has no enforceable lien as against the plaintiffs in error.
Assuming that Dunfee agreed with ■ the defendant in error to pay twenty-five hundred dollars on the mortgage held by The Union Central Life Insurance Comnanv. which by the way is controverted the defendant in error can assert no lien against the mortgagee or those holding under
The plaintiff in error, Cline, holds under the mortgagee, The Union Central Life Insurance Company, and besides, from the conceded facts appears to have been an innocent purchaser.
The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and we render final
Judgment for plaintiffs in error.
