Ullrich v. Bronx House Community CenterUllrich v. Bronx House Community Center
Plaintiff’s father testified that he observed a dispute on the basketball court involving the assailant and other club members several months earlier. However, plaintiff failed to show that the notice was sufficiently specific for defendants to have reasonably anticipated the assault upon plaintiff (see Kamara v City of New York, 93 AD3d 449, 450 [2012]). Defendants’ failure to terminate the assailant’s club membership after the earlier incident was not the proximate cause of the assault, which was an intentional and unforeseeable act of a third party (see Sugarman v Equinox Holdings, Inc., 73 AD3d 654, 655 [2010]). Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.
The decision and order of this Court entered herein on June 19, 2012 (96 AD3d 582 [2012]), is hereby recalled and vacated (see 2012 NY Slip Op 86621[U] [decided simultaneously herewith]).