midpage

Ullman v. CurbeloUllman v. Curbelo

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Oct 24, 1989
No. 89-1241
Versions:550 So. 2d 1178
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2502
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6118
1989 WL 126499

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw the opinion filed September 5, 1989, and in its place issue the following:

By means of a motion to set aside judgment filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, appellee asserted that a post-default judgment assessing damages should' be vacated because the court had failed to conduct a trial by jury. The trial court agreed that it had acted in error and vacated the judgment. The proper vehicle for asserting error is by appeal, and not by motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Florida Rule' of Civil Procedure 1.540. Rutshaw v. Arakas, 549 So.2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to reinstate the final judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Ullman v. Curbelo
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 24, 1989
Citations: 550 So. 2d 1178; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2502; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6118; 1989 WL 126499; No. 89-1241
Docket Number: No. 89-1241
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In