Uhle v. Burnham

42 F. 1 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York | 1890

Lacombe, J.

It seems unnecessary to add anything to tbe full discussion of the questions raised on this motion which will be found in *2Kansas City, etc., Ry. Co. v. Interstate Lumber Co., 37 Fed. Rep. 3, (by Judge Brewer,) and Burck v. Taylor, 39 Fed. Rep. 581, (by Judge Maxey.) The motion to remand is denied. See, also, First Nat. Bank v. Merchants’ Bank, 37 Fed. Rep. 657.