517 P.3d 905
Nev.
2022
82556: Case View
Nevada
Appellate Courts
Appellate Case Management System
C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts
22-30581: This document is currently unavailable. If you need a copy of this document, please contact Clerk's Office at (775)684-1600.
Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.
Only filed documents can be viewed. Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.
Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.
For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 82556
Short Caption:UBER TECH., INC. VS. ROYZCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A810843Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:03/09/2021 / Jimmerson, JamesSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:08/02/2022 at 10:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:08/02/2022How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information
RoleParty NameRepresented By
AppellantRasier, LLCKaren L. Bashor (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
Ryan T. Gormley (Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
D. Lee Roberts, Jr. (Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
Douglas M. Rowan (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
AppellantRasier-CA, LLCKaren L. Bashor (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
Ryan T. Gormley (Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
D. Lee Roberts, Jr. (Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
Douglas M. Rowan (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
AppellantUber Technologies, IncKaren L. Bashor (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
Ryan T. Gormley (Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
D. Lee Roberts, Jr. (Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
Douglas M. Rowan (Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
RespondentAndrea Eileen WorkNatalie Stephanie Pang (Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
Trevor M. Quirk (Quirk Law Firm)
Kevin Francis Ruf (Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
Jerold Sullivan (Sullivan & Sullivan)
RespondentMegan RoyzNatalie Stephanie Pang (Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
Trevor M. Quirk (Quirk Law Firm)
Kevin Francis Ruf (Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
Jerold Sullivan (Sullivan & Sullivan)

+ Due Items
Due DateStatusDue ItemDue From
10/24/2022OpenRemittitur

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
02/26/2021Filing FeeFiling Fee due for Appeal. (SC)
02/26/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)21-05813
02/26/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 10 days. (SC)21-05816
03/08/2021Filing FeeFiling Fee Paid. $250.00 from Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial. Check no. 159736. (SC)
03/08/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. Docketing Statement mailed to counsel for appellants - due: 21 days. (SC)21-06714
03/09/2021Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: James J. Jimmerson. (SC)21-06787
03/16/2021Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Not Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is not appropriate for mediation. All parties are in agreement that no compromise is possible. (SC)21-07568
03/17/2021Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. This appeal is removed from the settlement program. Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 90 days opening brief. (SC)21-07705
03/29/2021Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. (SC)21-08941
03/31/2021Transcript RequestFiled Appellants' Certificate of No Transcript Request. (SC)21-09340
06/15/2021MotionFiled Stipulation to Extend Time to File Opening Brief and Appendix. (SC)21-17272
06/16/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Motion/Stipulation Approved for Opening Brief and Appendix. Due date is July 15, 2021. (SC)21-17318
07/15/2021BriefFiled Appellants' Opening Brief. (SC)21-20500
07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 1. (SC)21-20501
07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 2. (SC)21-20502
07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 3. (SC)21-20503
07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 4. (SC)21-20504
09/08/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order to File Answering Brief. To date, respondents have not filed the answering brief or otherwise communicated with this court. Respondents shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve the answering brief. (SC)21-26049
09/14/2021MotionFiled Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Submit Answering Brief. (SC)21-26607
09/21/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. The parties have filed a stipulation for a second extension of time to file the answering brief. The stipulation is treated as a joint motion and granted. Respondent's answering brief due: October 15, 2021. (SC)21-27285
10/15/2021BriefFiled Respondents' Answering Brief. (SC)21-29658
10/28/2021MotionFiled Stipulation to Extend Reply Brief Deadline. (SC)21-31074
10/28/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Motion/Stipulation Approved for Reply Brief. Due date December 15, 2021. (SC)21-31149
12/14/2021MotionFiled Appellants' Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief. (SC)21-35655
12/28/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Appellants shall have until January 14, 2022, to file and serve the reply brief. (SC)21-36834
01/14/2022MotionFiled Appellants' Motion for Excess Pages/Exceed Word Limit on Reply Brief. (SC)22-01544
01/14/2022BriefFiled Appellants' Reply Brief. (SC)22-01546
01/25/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Appellants' motion for leave to file a reply brief in excess of the type-volume limitation is granted. The reply brief was filed on January 14, 2022. (SC)22-02471
01/25/2022Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening. (SC)
03/15/2022MotionFiled Respondents' Motion to Associate Kevin Ruf. (SC)22-08225
03/15/2022MotionFiled Respondents' Motion to Associate Counsel Natalie Stephanie Pang. (SC)22-08228
03/29/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motions. Respondents have filed motions to associate attorneys Kevin Francis Ruf and Natalie Stephanie Pang of the law firm of Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP in this matter pursuant to SCR 42. The motions are granted. Mr. Ruf and Ms. Pang shall be permitted to appear on behalf of respondents in this appeal. (SC)22-09748
05/26/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Submitting for Decision Without Oral Argument. (SC)22-16816
06/21/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This court has determined that oral argument may be of assistance in resolving this matter. Accordingly, this matter is scheduled for oral argument on August 2, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. in Carson City. Argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. (SC)22-19554
07/18/2022Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. (SC)22-22544
08/02/2022Case Status UpdateOral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the En Banc Court. {SC}
09/29/2022Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. "Reversed and remanded with instructions." Before the Court En Banc. Author: Silver, J. Majority: Parraguirre/Hardesty/Cadish/Silver/Pickering. Herndon, J., with whom Stiglich, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. 138 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 66. En Banc. (SC).22-30581
Combined Case View